FAQ

It means the system is designed for coherence: clean feedback loops, predictable behavior, low-friction UX, and stable primitives underneath. In practice: fewer edge-case collapses, better user trust, and software that feels “right” when you use it.

We don’t ship vibes. We ship behavior that holds up.

We’re a product lab with a systems studio attached. We ship our own products and we build custom systems for teams that need production-grade execution. The common thread is foundations-first engineering: invariants, primitives, and verifiable outputs.

Founders, operators, and teams who want real output:

• Product-grade builds (not prototypes)
• Systems that can prove what happened (provenance / verification)
• Intelligence systems that actually ship (ranking, scoring, decision engines)
• Interfaces that feel premium and intuitive

Kojib operates as a remote-first team with global reach. The best way to connect is through our Contact page or by starting on Start.

It means the system can prove key facts: what happened, when it happened, who authored it, and whether it was altered. We implement verification flows, tamper-evident records, deterministic time (when needed), and cryptographic signatures so integrity isn’t dependent on trust.

Receiz is proof of occurrence: “this event happened,” verifiable via a receipt-like artifact and link.

Glyph/sigil proof is artifact-first provenance: “this came from me” (authorship/origin), embedded directly into a portable artifact (often visual) that can be verified later.

Yes—when designed for it. Offline verification usually means the proof artifact includes enough data to validate integrity without calling a server (hashes, signatures, and relevant metadata).

No. We use cryptography under the hood when it’s the right tool. The user experience stays simple: create → seal → verify.

We build security into the system:

• Threat modeling and safe defaults
• Strong authentication patterns (including passkeys where appropriate)
• Signed artifacts / tamper-evident records where integrity matters
• Clear access control boundaries and auditability

It depends on the product. When possible, we design artifact-first workflows that minimize centralized storage. If a system requires storage, we scope it clearly (what is stored, why, retention, and access policy).

Yes. We regularly build systems with strict requirements: access controls, audit logs, secure integrations, and deployment hardening. If you have constraints, we’ll bake them into the build spec.

1. Build Assessment (when needed): scope, success criteria, architecture, risks.
2. Sprint: ship a production-grade milestone fast.
3. Execution: expand into full system with hardening and iteration.
4. Retainer (optional): ongoing upgrades, performance, and reliability.

Start here: Start or Contact.

Teams that care about output quality: founders, small product teams, and operators who want systems that hold up. If you need “real product shipped” with proof-grade integrity, we’re aligned.

If the target is clear, start with a sprint. If scope is uncertain, start with an assessment. We optimize for shipping: the smallest real milestone that proves the system.

Yes. We can stay engaged via retainer for ongoing upgrades, reliability improvements, and iteration cadence.